1. What is Premarin®? As the name implies, Premarin® is a conjugated estrogen product extracted from pregnant mares' urine (PMU). It is manufactured by Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., and is most commonly prescribed for estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) to relieve hormonal deficiency symptoms associated with menopause or hysterectomy. More recently, it has been prescribed to help prevent osteoporosis and heart disease. Premarin® is the most widely used ERT drug, marketed for more than 50 years, and currently administered to more than nine million American women.
2. How many PMU farms exist and where are they located?
There are an estimated 500 PMU farms in North America, with the vast majority located in the prairie provinces of western Canada. About 30 PMU farms exist in North Dakota, near the Canadian border, and more have reportedly been established in Minnesota. Almost all PMU farms are under an exclusive contract to provide pregnant mares' urine to Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories. Because the market for ERT drugs is expected to expand dramatically as millions of women from the "Baby Boom" generation enter menopause, it is likely that the number of PMU farms will increase proportionately.
3. How is the estrogen-rich urine for Premarin® obtained?
Mares enter the collection barns in September and remain until March or April. Each mare is kept tethered in a narrow stall with a rubber cup positioned over her vulva to collect the urine flow. The cup is held in place by overhead supports and a partial body harness. The tether and collection apparatus greatly restrict movement, and the mare is unable to turn around or take more than a step or two in any direction. If the tether is too short, she may even be unable to lie down comfortably.
4. How many horses are involved in PMU production and how are they acquired?
PMU mares are obtained from a variety of sources. Most of the farm managers buy or breed their own horses. A few lease pregnant mares from rental stables and rodeo stock companies, as estrogen collection occurs only during off-season months. Reliable estimates indicate there are at least 50,000 production mares on PMU farms, accounting for the births of approximately 40,000 offspring annually. When the number of breeding stallions, immature mares, replacement mares, and their foals are added, the total is considerably greater than 100,000 horses.
5. What happens to unproductive mares?
PMU mares may be used for several consecutive years—provided, of course, that they become pregnant again during the brief summer breeding season. But because there is a serious overpopulation of horses throughout North America, and PMU mares are often untrained and difficult to handle, there is little demand for them once they have outlived their usefulness as estrogen producers. Typically, barren or unproductive mares are sent to the slaughterhouse.
6. What happens to the foals of PMU mares?
Foals are allowed to nurse and be with their mothers for only three to four months—instead of the normal six-month period. When the time comes for the mares to return to the collection barns, the farmers dispose of surplus foals. A few female foals may be kept for future PMU production, and some farmers even breed registered horses in hopes of selling the foals as riding prospects. Thousands of remaining foals are sent to unsheltered feedlots until they reach a desirable market weight. There they are slaughtered and their carcasses shipped to Europe and Asia for human consumption.
7. Are there additional humane concerns?
Inspection reports document a number of significant problems. PMU mares are confined to individual stalls for approximately 6 months of their 11-month pregnancy. These normally active animals are given very little, if any, exercise. They cannot interact naturally with other horses. They are usually not given adequate bedding material that would cushion and insulate the cold, hard floors on which they are forced to stand or lie. Observers report that the mares exhibit an abnormally high frequency of leg injuries, and edema in the chest and legs. Grooming is neglected and hooves are seldom trimmed. PMU producers may wait too long to seek professional veterinary care for serious illnesses and injuries.
8. Is the quantity of feed and water sufficient?
While the quality and amount of feed provided is considered appropriate, pregnant mares may receive considerably less water than they would normally drink. In fact, the drug company recommends that PMU farms use automatic watering systems that distribute water at timed intervals and in carefully measured amounts. In the past, it was commonly reported that water was restricted in order to increase the concentration of estrogens by volume of urine and thereby reduce shipping costs. The pharmaceutical company now claims that the water restriction policy has been modified; however, they remain unwilling to allow humane organizations access to the farms to verify such changes.
9. Is the PMU industry's Code of Practice adequate to address these welfare concerns?
No. The Code of Practice was adopted only after Wyeth-Ayerst came under considerable attack from Canadian animal protection groups. Developed in conjunction with agricultural consultants, the code offers corporate recommendations for sanitation, housing, equipment maintenance, feeding, etc. But it is not a law and its provisions are deemed voluntary. PMU farmers have generally been given considerable leeway by the drug company inspectors to deviate from the recommendations. Even strict adherence to the code would not ensure that horses are treated humanely. For example, the code recommends exercise, but does not specify the frequency or amount of exercise necessary. The code also condones the premature separation of mares and foals, but fails to address the humane disposition of unwanted foals and unproductive mares.
10. What are the prospects for addressing these cruelties through new laws or government regulations?
Not very good. Years ago, PMU farming was primarily situated in the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec. When animal-protection groups opposed the mistreatment of horses and PMU farms faced the certainty of regulatory reform, the entire industry simply moved its operations to the more accommodating provinces of western Canada. Given this history, if stringent regulations were enacted, PMU farms would likely relocate to other areas or to developing countries where there may be even less ability to influence the care the horses receive. PMU farming occurs in only two states in the U.S., so there is unlikely to be sufficient support for federal legislation.
11. Are there acceptable alternatives to Premarin® for estrogen replacement therapy?
There are a number of plant-derived or synthetic estrogens that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved as safe and effective for ERT. Some physicians believe that certain alternative estrogens may, in fact, be superior to Premarin® in terms of both performance and patient tolerance. And, because these estrogens are derived from plant materials such as Mexican yams and soybeans, or are synthesized in the laboratory, they do not promote the direct and continuing suffering of horses.
12. My doctor says that other estrogen replacement drugs have not been proven to be as safe as Premarin®. Is this true?
Because Premarin® has been on the market longer than any of the other estrogen replacement drugs, many of the long-term studies on estrogen replacement therapy evaluated Premarin® specifically. For this reason, however, some of the long-term disadvantages of estrogen use have also been noted—including the increased risk of developing uterine and breast cancer—which apply to the use of Premarin®.
13. What can concerned individuals do to reduce the suffering of horses on PMU farms?
First, you can educate yourself and others about the mistreatment of horses used for the manufacture of Premarin®. Because this is an important health care issue, women should thoroughly discuss treatment options with a physician. Together, the doctor and patient can evaluate possible dietary changes and exercise programs that may minimize hormonal deficiency symptoms and help prevent osteoporosis and heart disease. If it is determined that estrogen replacement therapy is appropriate, the use of a plant-derived or synthetic ERT drug offers an ethical alternative to Premarin®.
Educate your Doctors, educate your friends. Spread the word! Contact Wyeth at the address below, and tell them how you feel.Use alternative synthetics and plant products with your doctor's blessings! My gyn prescribed Premarin for me. I asked her if she knew how it was made. She is a horse lover. She was shocked and will never prescribe it again. Persuasion and education work.
Wyeth
5 Giralda Farms
Madison, NJ 07940
The video below is quite graphic but it sure gets the message across.
Please close this journal after you launch the video so that you can hear the audio portion.
A Bitter Pill
Visit these sites for more information and to take action!
2 comments:
I WAS ON PREMARIN FOR 10 YEARS AND GOT BLOOD CLOTS TWICE AND THEY TOOK ME OFF AND I CAN'T TAKE ANY OF THOSE REPLACEMENTS.
BETTY
I'M SO GLAD YOU POSTED THAT INFO JO, I WAS NOT AWARE OF ALL THE PREMARIN INFO, IT MAKES ME REALLY SAD AND ALSO REALLY MAD!!! THANKS SO MUCH FOR MAKING EVERYONE AWARE!!!
LUV YA,
CHERYL
:>)
Post a Comment